<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: N.Y. Assembly passes drunk driving bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drunkdrivingduilawblog.com/duilaw/n-y-assembly-passes-drunk-driving-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drunkdrivingduilawblog.com/dui-legal-news/n-y-assembly-passes-drunk-driving-bill/</link>
	<description>DUI Legal News - DUI Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin J McShane, Esquire</title>
		<link>http://www.drunkdrivingduilawblog.com/dui-legal-news/n-y-assembly-passes-drunk-driving-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-9643</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin J McShane, Esquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drunkdrivingduilawblog.com/?p=1017#comment-9643</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that Ignition Interlock Devices (IID) are not necessarily the solution.  Here is why in about 3 sentences.  A super-majority of these first time offenders statistically according to NHTSA&#039;s own research do not typically re-offend within the period of even the nation&#039;s longest period for imposition of a loss of license even with the extended interlock.  So, the question becomes why implement IIDs?  Money.  The IID industry is all in private hands and makes a lot of money.  I mean a lot.

-Justin J. McShane, Esquire, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.PADUIblog.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PA DUI Attorney&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that Ignition Interlock Devices (IID) are not necessarily the solution.  Here is why in about 3 sentences.  A super-majority of these first time offenders statistically according to NHTSA&#8217;s own research do not typically re-offend within the period of even the nation&#8217;s longest period for imposition of a loss of license even with the extended interlock.  So, the question becomes why implement IIDs?  Money.  The IID industry is all in private hands and makes a lot of money.  I mean a lot.</p>
<p>-Justin J. McShane, Esquire, <a href="http://www.PADUIblog.com" rel="nofollow">PA DUI Attorney</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.drunkdrivingduilawblog.com @ 2012-02-10 08:36:39 -->
