Drunk Driving DUI Law

A new state law could make the cost of a DUI conviction go through the roof for local Petersburg residents. Beginning January 1, a DUI or refusal conviction will mean that a driver must install an ignition interlock device on their vehicle.

The device, once installed, does not allow a driver to start their car without first performing a breath test. An ignition interlock prevents the car from starting unless it registers a person’s blood alcohol content below a pre-set level determined by the courts.

Drivers convicted of a DUI would have to keep the device installed in their car for the first 12 months of their probation on a first offense and 24 months upon a second conviction.

The problem of cost arises from lack of a local vendor in Petersburg. The company Smart Start, which manufactures the interlock devices, lists their closest vendors as being located in Juneau, Sitka, and Ketchikan. That would mean extensive travel by ferry for a Petersburg resident as companies providing installation all reported that the device requires monthly calibration. Vendors in all three cities said that initial installation costs $150. A driver then rents the product for the cost of $125 a month, which covers the cost of calibration.

Travel costs, combined with the minimum $1,500 fine, could put those convicted of a DUI in a financial pinch, which could mean less money spent on preventative measures like counseling.

When asked for her opinion, Petersburg Mental Health Service’s Director Susan Ohmer responded by saying, “The question of whether money for purchase and installation of the ignition lock for convicted DUI offenders could be better spent elsewhere is a good one. As a professional and as a person who has had loved ones die from the consequences of alcoholism I prefer to prevent problems before they begin. However, I am also a realist, and the reality is that consequences, real consequences that are unpleasant and pinch at our freedoms, are often the things that motivate us to change,” she said. “I would prefer for people to make low risk drinking choices or to remain sober. If a person continues to choose high-risk behaviors, then it is reasonable to take steps to improve the safety for the other people on the road. PMHS remains available to help anyone who wants to stop drinking or who wants to reduce their risk of developing the disease of alcoholism.”

Another solution would be for a local shop to begin providing the installation and calibration system. That could require a large initial investment, however, as Smart Start’s website asks prospective clients to have a minimum $50,000 in capital available.
A new state law could make the cost of a DUI conviction go through the roof for local Petersburg residents. Beginning January 1, a DUI or refusal conviction will mean that a driver must install an ignition interlock device on their vehicle.

The device, once installed, does not allow a driver to start their car without first performing a breath test. An ignition interlock prevents the car from starting unless it registers a person’s blood alcohol content below a pre-set level determined by the courts.

Drivers convicted of a DUI would have to keep the device installed in their car for the first 12 months of their probation on a first offense and 24 months upon a second conviction.

The problem of cost arises from lack of a local vendor in Petersburg. The company Smart Start, which manufactures the interlock devices, lists their closest vendors as being located in Juneau, Sitka, and Ketchikan. That would mean extensive travel by ferry for a Petersburg resident as companies providing installation all reported that the device requires monthly calibration. Vendors in all three cities said that initial installation costs $150. A driver then rents the product for the cost of $125 a month, which covers the cost of calibration.

Travel costs, combined with the minimum $1,500 fine, could put those convicted of a DUI in a financial pinch, which could mean less money spent on preventative measures like counseling.

When asked for her opinion, Petersburg Mental Health Service’s Director Susan Ohmer responded by saying, “The question of whether money for purchase and installation of the ignition lock for convicted DUI offenders could be better spent elsewhere is a good one. As a professional and as a person who has had loved ones die from the consequences of alcoholism I prefer to prevent problems before they begin. However, I am also a realist, and the reality is that consequences, real consequences that are unpleasant and pinch at our freedoms, are often the things that motivate us to change,” she said. “I would prefer for people to make low risk drinking choices or to remain sober. If a person continues to choose high-risk behaviors, then it is reasonable to take steps to improve the safety for the other people on the road. PMHS remains available to help anyone who wants to stop drinking or who wants to reduce their risk of developing the disease of alcoholism.”

Another solution would be for a local shop to begin providing the installation and calibration system. That could require a large initial investment, however, as Smart Start’s website asks prospective clients to have a minimum $50,000 in capital available.