Circumstancial DUI Upheld by Wisconsin High Court
Gregg K. was bombed when police arrested him at his wife’s home in Wausau in 2006. He wasn’t driving, or even in a motor vehicle, and no one saw him driving to get there. So how did prosecutors convict him of his fifth-offense drunken driving?
They relied on circumstantial evidence, the kind commonly used to prove many other crimes but extremely rare in drunken driving cases. Gregg appealed, but on Tuesday the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld his conviction.
Gregg was done in by the electronic monitoring device he was wearing while on probation for other offenses. It showed he left his mother’s house in Rib Mountain about 15 minutes before he was arrested in Wausau. Jurors concluded he must have driven himself there.
Gregg challenged the admissibility of a computer-generated report from his monitoring device, offered without expert testimony.
According to the opinion, written by Justice David Prosser, police arrested Gregg after his estranged wife called to say he had broken into her home. At the hospital where he was treated for injuries suffered when he broke in, Gregg had a 0.23 blood-alcohol level. His green van was parked near his wife’s house, so police charged him with DUI.
read more…

Recent Comments